I have the full picture. The find --material AIBN sweep (which is not subject to the 30-line cap) returned exactly 12 records, and I verified the later ones directly.

Batches using AIBN catalyst (12 records):

• Batch 34 — AIBN catalyst 0.2 gm (first add, dissolved in toluene) + 0.32 gm (second add) in the acrylate step [28112025 9076 Expt Table 2025.xls, sheet 9076_Experiments, block 34]
• Batch 34 B — AIBN catalyst (Himedia) 0.2 gm + 0.32 gm [LBN 34 -B.pdf, pp. 1–2; Expt Table block 34B]
• Batch 34 C — AIBN catalyst 0.2 gm + 0.32 gm [Expt Table block 34C]
• Batch 35 — AIBN catalyst 52 mg + 0.725 gm (two acrylate sub-steps) [Expt Table block 35]
• Batch 36 — AIBN 0.4 gm (dissolved) + 0.64 gm (second portion) [LBN 36.pdf, pp. 1–2; Expt Table block 36]
• Batch 37 — AIBN catalyst 0.4 gm + 0.64 gm [Expt Table block 37]
• Batch 37 A — AIBN catalyst 0.4 gm + 0.64 gm [Expt Table block 37A]
• Batch 39 — AIBN 0.6 gm added at 79 °C [Expt Table block 39]
• Batch 40 — AIBN (initiator) [Expt Table block 40]
• Batch 58 — AIBN (name legible, quantity not legible) [Expt Table block 58]
• Batch 59 — initiator OCR-garbled ("ATBN"), flagged as consistent with AIBN/ATBN used in other batches; quantity not legible [Expt Table block 59]
• Batch 60 — "AIBN (0.05%)" [Expt Table block 60]

Note: batches 58 and 59 have illegible/garbled initiator cells, so their AIBN attribution is inferred, not verbatim.