All 8 "not ok" records have failure reasons. Here is the complete list:

Failed experiments (9076) — all 8 records:

| Batch | Failure reason (verbatim basis) |
|---|---|
| Batch 40 | "Tested against RED 57:1, BLUE 15:3, YELLOW 12 pigment ; yellow pigment gloss less while other RED & Blue pigment good" |
| Batch 41 | "Tested for Violet-23 & Black / Both pigment resolubility fail" |
| Batch 63 | "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)." |
| Batch 65 | "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)." |
| Batch 66 | "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)." |
| Batch 68 | "Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior)." |
| Batch 69 | "Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior)." |

Plus one stub:

• S 9076 (exp-9076-000S9076) — marked "not ok" but a STUB (unlinked sample, 0 process steps, no failure reason on record).

Notes:

• Per the drop's convention, only *failed* application-test reports are present, so "no failure on record" does not mean a batch passed — these 7 are the only failures documented here.
• Batches 63, 65, 66 are "inferior" verdicts vs the same-day BYK-9076 standard run (gloss + re-solubility); 68, 69 vs the same-day standard (gloss + colour strength). Batches 40, 41 are comparative pigment-gloss / resolubility failures vs BYK-9076.
• Batch 40 also has a full ELN (Lab Batch 40.pdf) with measured values; the rest are test-report rows only.