Which batches failed because of gloss?21 Aug 12:01
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Seven of the nine "not ok" batches failed (in whole or in part) on gloss:
That's 8 of the 9 not-ok records. The one not-ok batch with no gloss failure is Batch 41, which failed only on "Both pigment resolubility fail" (Violet-23 & Black). Per the test reports, these "inferior" verdicts are comparative against the same-day BYK-9076 standard run. Batches marked "ok" or "unknown" show no gloss-related failure in their outcome basis; for unknown batches only the absence of a recorded failure exists (no failure on record ≠ pass).
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Seven of the nine "not ok" batches failed (in whole or in part) on gloss:
- Batch 40 (19.x, ELN): "Tested against RED 57:1, BLUE 15:3, YELLOW 12 pigment; yellow pigment gloss less while other RED & Blue pigment good" — gloss failure only for the yellow pigment [Lab Batch 40.pdf, page 1]
- Batch 63 (04.05.2026 issued; 05.05.2026 completed): "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)" [S 9076 #63 not ok.docx, section "Results"]
- Batch 65 (04.05.2026): "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)" [S 9076 #65 not ok.docx, test report table]
- Batch 66 (04.05.2026 issued; 05.05.2026 completed): "Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)" [S 9076 #66 not ok.docx, page 1]
- Batch 68 (02.06.2026): "Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior)" [S 9076 #68 not ok.docx, main table]
- Batch 69 (02.06.2026): "Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior)" [S 9076 #69 not ok.docx, application test report, Results row]
- Batch 70 (09.06.2026): "Not OK (Gloss, Re-solubility and Colour strength inferior)" [S 9076 #70 not ok.docx, page 1]
- Batch 76 (04.05.2026, 3 samples): "Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior)" [S 9076 #SAW 10020626 not ok.docx, APPLICATION TEST REPORT]
That's 8 of the 9 not-ok records. The one not-ok batch with no gloss failure is Batch 41, which failed only on "Both pigment resolubility fail" (Violet-23 & Black). Per the test reports, these "inferior" verdicts are comparative against the same-day BYK-9076 standard run. Batches marked "ok" or "unknown" show no gloss-related failure in their outcome basis; for unknown batches only the absence of a recorded failure exists (no failure on record ≠ pass).
Sources
confidence: high
Qwen3.8 27B
what is the raw material in batch 6521 Aug 12:31
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
The records do not contain raw-material (input ingredients) information for batch 65. The only record for this batch — exp-9076-065 — is the application-test report, not an ELN. It holds:
These are test media/standards, not raw materials used to make batch 65. No process steps, no materials list, no ELN report exists for batch 65 in this data drop (the record shows steps=0, samples=1, sourced solely from the "not ok" application-test report).
So the gap is: no ELN/manufacturing record for batch 65 is present here — only its application-test summary — and the raw materials fed into batch 65 cannot be identified from the structured records.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'coreTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.core' instead.
Warning: Legacy setting 'excludeTools' will be ignored in /Users/moryasolutions/local-docqa/qa-home/.qwen/settings.json. Please use 'tools.exclude' instead.
The records do not contain raw-material (input ingredients) information for batch 65. The only record for this batch — exp-9076-065 — is the application-test report, not an ELN. It holds:
- Sample: "S 9076", batch no. "65", nature "Liquid", colour "Amber" [S 9076 #65 not ok.docx, test report table]
- Date 04.05.2026; conclusion "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior)."
- Two application tests in "Ink Base - Nitrocellulose Polyurethane" with pigments Violet 23 and Violet 27 (results vs BYK 9076 reference standard, e.g. Gloss @ 60° 55.9 vs 66.4 for Violet 23)
These are test media/standards, not raw materials used to make batch 65. No process steps, no materials list, no ELN report exists for batch 65 in this data drop (the record shows steps=0, samples=1, sourced solely from the "not ok" application-test report).
So the gap is: no ELN/manufacturing record for batch 65 is present here — only its application-test summary — and the raw materials fed into batch 65 cannot be identified from the structured records.
confidence: high
Qwen3.8 27B