Which batches used LUB-1600?21 Aug 02:47
No batch in this data drop used LUB-1600. A material search for
What the records do contain, for LUB-named materials, is only:
So the answer to the question as posed is: none — no record in this drop lists LUB-1600 as a material. If you meant LUB-1010, the batches are 48 (and its Q variant) and 51, all sourced from Viswaat. Note that the LUB 1010 hits in document text for batches 49, 50, and 54 A exist only in the OCR'd document text and in the 9076 Expt Table summary rows; those records store the ingredient under the same "LUB 1010" name, so if you're tracking a specific grade, the distinguishing lot numbers are R225100845 (batches 48/48Q/49/50 era) and R425110899 (batch 51 era).
LUB-1600 returns no records, and the only "1600" matches anywhere in the corpus are IR-spectroscopy x-axis labels (wavenumber ticks) — not material names.What the records do contain, for LUB-named materials, is only:
- Vicaspin LUB 1010 (R225100845) — Bu-EO-PO, HV-62.3, MW-900 — in Batch 48 (also Batch 48 Q, per the document text)
- Vicaspin LUB 1010 (R425110899/3.12.25) — Bu-EO-PO, HV-57.8, MW-970.5 — in Batch 51
So the answer to the question as posed is: none — no record in this drop lists LUB-1600 as a material. If you meant LUB-1010, the batches are 48 (and its Q variant) and 51, all sourced from Viswaat. Note that the LUB 1010 hits in document text for batches 49, 50, and 54 A exist only in the OCR'd document text and in the 9076 Expt Table summary rows; those records store the ingredient under the same "LUB 1010" name, so if you're tracking a specific grade, the distinguishing lot numbers are R225100845 (batches 48/48Q/49/50 era) and R425110899 (batch 51 era).
Sources
No record matches LUB-1600 (qa_cli find/search, no hits)
confidence: high