Who ran experiment 40, and on what date?21 Aug 01:26
The structured record for experiment 40 (alias "LBN 40") carries no runner field, and the date evidence is ambiguous. Here's what the sources actually contain:
Runner — not recorded in the ELN header. The Lab Journal for LBN 40 [Lab Batch 40.pdf, page 1] has an "Experiment No." field ("LBN 40") but no "Prepared by / run by" line in the structured record. On the ELN's later pages (pages 3–4, mostly scanned images), OCR picked up an email-looking string "satish_wangshudag@finsorganics.com" / "satish.w.w.ghudsgfneorgarics.com" plus the initials "s.w.w." These are heavily garbled by OCR (inconsistent spellings across lines, "finsorganics"/"fineorganica"/"finaorganica"), so they cannot be cited as a reliable person name. I will not assert a runner from them.
Date — only a garbled, inconsistent timestamp. Pages 3–4 OCR show "2026-8-04 12:32:45/46" and one line "2024-8-04 12:32:45". Two problems:
1. The 2026-8-04 stamp matches the OCR/processing date embedded in the OCR batch, not necessarily the experiment date, and is inconsistent with the 2024 reading on the same page.
2. It sits in a scanned-image region with corrupted text, so it is not trustworthy.
The summary-table block for batch 40 (csv rows 354-361) has only columns Batch No / Raw Materials / Reaction Conditions / Results / Remarks — no date or person columns at all.
Bottom line: This data drop does not contain a clean, citable runner or experiment date for experiment 40. What is missing: a populated "prepared by / run by" field in the ELN and a reliable date line; the only candidates are OCR-corrupted strings that conflict with each other.
Runner — not recorded in the ELN header. The Lab Journal for LBN 40 [Lab Batch 40.pdf, page 1] has an "Experiment No." field ("LBN 40") but no "Prepared by / run by" line in the structured record. On the ELN's later pages (pages 3–4, mostly scanned images), OCR picked up an email-looking string "satish_wangshudag@finsorganics.com" / "satish.w.w.ghudsgfneorgarics.com" plus the initials "s.w.w." These are heavily garbled by OCR (inconsistent spellings across lines, "finsorganics"/"fineorganica"/"finaorganica"), so they cannot be cited as a reliable person name. I will not assert a runner from them.
Date — only a garbled, inconsistent timestamp. Pages 3–4 OCR show "2026-8-04 12:32:45/46" and one line "2024-8-04 12:32:45". Two problems:
1. The 2026-8-04 stamp matches the OCR/processing date embedded in the OCR batch, not necessarily the experiment date, and is inconsistent with the 2024 reading on the same page.
2. It sits in a scanned-image region with corrupted text, so it is not trustworthy.
The summary-table block for batch 40 (csv rows 354-361) has only columns Batch No / Raw Materials / Reaction Conditions / Results / Remarks — no date or person columns at all.
Bottom line: This data drop does not contain a clean, citable runner or experiment date for experiment 40. What is missing: a populated "prepared by / run by" field in the ELN and a reliable date line; the only candidates are OCR-corrupted strings that conflict with each other.
Sources
confidence: low