Experiments / Batch 69
Batch 69 not OK
02.06.2026 ·
Mr. Mohan Yadav ·
also written as S 9076 · S 9076 #69
Conclusion — verbatim from the source
“Results: Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior).”
S 9076 #69 not ok.docx, application test report (Results row)
Aim
Application testing of sample S 9076 (batch 69) against reference standard BYK 9076 as dispersing additive in Nitrocellulose ink resin base, in Violet 23, Violet 27, and Carbon Black N 330 ink systems.
Observations
Physical appearance: Reference Standard BYK 9076 – Amber to yellow viscous liquid; S 9076 – Yellow viscous liquid. Violet 23: S 9076 slightly opaque, color strength 98-99 vs 100.00, re-solubility rating 1 (Fail) vs 3. Violet 27: S 9076 colour shade bluer, color strength 60-70 vs 100.00, re-solubility printed value 18.5 vs 3. Carbon Black N 330: S 9076 in line with reference on all printed parameters.
Raw materials
| Material | Role |
|---|---|
| S 9076 (Batch No 69) | - |
| BYK 9076 | - |
Reaction conditions (optimized)
other: Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured B4 Cup @26°C. Re-solubility rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent.
Sample unspecified sample
result
Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 23)
| Parameter | This sample |
|---|---|
| Grinding (µm) | Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm |
| Colour Shade | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std |
| Transparency | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Slightly opaque |
| Color Strength (%) | Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 98-99 |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) | Ref Standard 29 s, S 9076 30 s |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass |
| Gloss @ 60° | Ref Standard 67.1, S 9076 64.2 |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | Ref Standard 3, S 9076 1 |
| Separation | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
| Settling | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
vs standard: Colour shade as per standard; transparency slightly opaque vs reference; color strength 98-99 vs 100.00; re-solubility 1 (Fail) vs 3 (Average)
result
Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 27)
| Parameter | This sample |
|---|---|
| Grinding (µm) | Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm |
| Colour Shade | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Bluer |
| Transparency | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Transparent |
| Color Strength (%) | Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 60-70 |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) | Ref Standard 27 s, S 9076 28 s |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass |
| Gloss @ 60° | Ref Standard 8.8, S 9076 7.9 |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | Ref Standard 3, S 9076 18.5 |
| Separation | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
| Settling | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
vs standard: Colour shade bluer; color strength 60-70 vs 100.00; gloss 7.9 vs 8.8; re-solubility value 18.5 (outside 1-5 rating scale, verbatim as printed) vs 3
result
Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Carbon Black N 330)
| Parameter | This sample |
|---|---|
| Grinding (µm) | Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm |
| Colour Shade | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std |
| Transparency | Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std |
| Color Strength (%) | Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 100.00 |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) | Ref Standard 32 s, S 9076 33 s |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass |
| Gloss @ 60° | Ref Standard 41.9, S 9076 45.4 |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | Ref Standard 3, S 9076 2 |
| Separation | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
| Settling | Ref Standard No, S 9076 No |
vs standard: Matches reference on all parameters; re-solubility 2 (Poor) vs 3 (Average); gloss slightly higher (45.4 vs 41.9)
Test report photos
Where this record comes from
S 9076 #69 not ok.docx
— application testing
Something wrong on this page? Record a correction
Your correction is permanent: it survives every re-extraction and the field can no longer be changed by the system.
Field-by-field provenance (8 fields) — for auditors
1 extraction fragments · merged 2026-08-25 · 0 human-validated fields
Fix a wrong or missing extraction side-by-side with the original:
qwen-extract--s-9076-69-not-ok--s-9076-69
| Field | Source | Extractor | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| scientist | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| aim | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| materials[0] | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| materials[1] | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| samples[0] | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| observations | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| outcome | S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
Raw record JSON
{
"record_id": "exp-9076-069",
"project": "9076",
"aliases": [
"S 9076",
"S 9076 #69"
],
"provenance": {
"fragments": [
"qwen-extract--s-9076-69-not-ok--s-9076-69"
],
"field_provenance": {
"date": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
},
"scientist": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
},
"aim": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
},
"materials[0]": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"confidence": "high",
"human_checked": true
},
"materials[1]": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"confidence": "high",
"human_checked": true
},
"samples[0]": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
},
"observations": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
},
"outcome": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
"human_checked": true
}
},
"last_merged": "2026-08-25"
},
"documents": [
{
"file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
"role": "application_test",
"link_basis": "alias match: S 9076",
"link_status": "rule"
}
],
"validation": {
"validated_fields": {},
"corrections_applied": []
},
"date": "02.06.2026",
"scientist": "Mr. Mohan Yadav",
"aim": "Application testing of sample S 9076 (batch 69) against reference standard BYK 9076 as dispersing additive in Nitrocellulose ink resin base, in Violet 23, Violet 27, and Carbon Black N 330 ink systems.",
"conditions": {
"other": "Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured B4 Cup @26°C. Re-solubility rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent."
},
"materials": [
{
"name": "S 9076 (Batch No 69)",
"role": "unknown",
"physical_appearance": "Yellow viscous liquid",
"role_verbatim": "sample under test"
},
{
"name": "BYK 9076",
"role": "unknown",
"physical_appearance": "Amber to yellow viscous liquid",
"role_verbatim": "reference standard"
}
],
"samples": [
{
"sample_name": "S 9076",
"batch": "69",
"reference_standard": "BYK 9076",
"application_tests": [
{
"test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
"system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 23",
"result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Slightly opaque; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 98-99; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 29 s, S 9076 30 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 67.1, S 9076 64.2; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 1; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
"vs_reference": "Colour shade as per standard; transparency slightly opaque vs reference; color strength 98-99 vs 100.00; re-solubility 1 (Fail) vs 3 (Average)"
},
{
"test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
"system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 27",
"result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Bluer; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Transparent; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 60-70; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 27 s, S 9076 28 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 8.8, S 9076 7.9; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 18.5; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
"vs_reference": "Colour shade bluer; color strength 60-70 vs 100.00; gloss 7.9 vs 8.8; re-solubility value 18.5 (outside 1-5 rating scale, verbatim as printed) vs 3"
},
{
"test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
"system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Carbon Black N 330",
"result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 100.00; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 32 s, S 9076 33 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 41.9, S 9076 45.4; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 2; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
"vs_reference": "Matches reference on all parameters; re-solubility 2 (Poor) vs 3 (Average); gloss slightly higher (45.4 vs 41.9)"
}
],
"sample_id": "unspecified sample"
}
],
"observations": "Physical appearance: Reference Standard BYK 9076 – Amber to yellow viscous liquid; S 9076 – Yellow viscous liquid.\nViolet 23: S 9076 slightly opaque, color strength 98-99 vs 100.00, re-solubility rating 1 (Fail) vs 3.\nViolet 27: S 9076 colour shade bluer, color strength 60-70 vs 100.00, re-solubility printed value 18.5 vs 3.\nCarbon Black N 330: S 9076 in line with reference on all printed parameters.",
"outcome": {
"status": "not ok",
"basis": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior).",
"citation": "S 9076 #69 not ok.docx, application test report (Results row)"
}
}

