← Back batch 98 of 100 ← Batch 68 Batch 70 →
Experiments / Batch 69

Batch 69 not OK

02.06.2026 · Mr. Mohan Yadav · also written as S 9076 · S 9076 #69
Conclusion — verbatim from the source
“Results: Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior).”
S 9076 #69 not ok.docx, application test report (Results row)
Aim

Application testing of sample S 9076 (batch 69) against reference standard BYK 9076 as dispersing additive in Nitrocellulose ink resin base, in Violet 23, Violet 27, and Carbon Black N 330 ink systems.

Observations

Physical appearance: Reference Standard BYK 9076 – Amber to yellow viscous liquid; S 9076 – Yellow viscous liquid. Violet 23: S 9076 slightly opaque, color strength 98-99 vs 100.00, re-solubility rating 1 (Fail) vs 3. Violet 27: S 9076 colour shade bluer, color strength 60-70 vs 100.00, re-solubility printed value 18.5 vs 3. Carbon Black N 330: S 9076 in line with reference on all printed parameters.

Raw materials
MaterialRole
S 9076 (Batch No 69)-
BYK 9076-
Reaction conditions (optimized)
other: Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured B4 Cup @26°C. Re-solubility rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent.
Sample unspecified sample
result Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 23)
ParameterThis sample
Grinding (µm) Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm
Colour Shade Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std
Transparency Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Slightly opaque
Color Strength (%) Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 98-99
Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) Ref Standard 29 s, S 9076 30 s
Adhesion (Tape Test) Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass
Gloss @ 60° Ref Standard 67.1, S 9076 64.2
Re-solubility (Rating) Ref Standard 3, S 9076 1
Separation Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
Settling Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
vs standard: Colour shade as per standard; transparency slightly opaque vs reference; color strength 98-99 vs 100.00; re-solubility 1 (Fail) vs 3 (Average)
result Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 27)
ParameterThis sample
Grinding (µm) Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm
Colour Shade Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Bluer
Transparency Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Transparent
Color Strength (%) Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 60-70
Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) Ref Standard 27 s, S 9076 28 s
Adhesion (Tape Test) Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass
Gloss @ 60° Ref Standard 8.8, S 9076 7.9
Re-solubility (Rating) Ref Standard 3, S 9076 18.5
Separation Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
Settling Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
vs standard: Colour shade bluer; color strength 60-70 vs 100.00; gloss 7.9 vs 8.8; re-solubility value 18.5 (outside 1-5 rating scale, verbatim as printed) vs 3
result Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling) (Nitrocellulose ink, Carbon Black N 330)
ParameterThis sample
Grinding (µm) Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm
Colour Shade Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std
Transparency Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std
Color Strength (%) Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 100.00
Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) Ref Standard 32 s, S 9076 33 s
Adhesion (Tape Test) Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass
Gloss @ 60° Ref Standard 41.9, S 9076 45.4
Re-solubility (Rating) Ref Standard 3, S 9076 2
Separation Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
Settling Ref Standard No, S 9076 No
vs standard: Matches reference on all parameters; re-solubility 2 (Poor) vs 3 (Average); gloss slightly higher (45.4 vs 41.9)
Test report photos
S 9076 #69 not ok.docx — 3 photos
Where this record comes from
S 9076 #69 not ok.docx — application testing
Something wrong on this page? Record a correction
Your correction is permanent: it survives every re-extraction and the field can no longer be changed by the system.
Field-by-field provenance (8 fields) — for auditors
1 extraction fragments · merged 2026-08-25 · 0 human-validated fields
Fix a wrong or missing extraction side-by-side with the original: qwen-extract--s-9076-69-not-ok--s-9076-69
FieldSourceExtractorConf.
dateS 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
scientistS 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
aimS 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
materials[0]S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
materials[1]S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
samples[0]S 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
observationsS 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
outcomeS 9076 #69 not ok.docx full document (single page application test report) qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversionedhigh
Raw record JSON
{
  "record_id": "exp-9076-069",
  "project": "9076",
  "aliases": [
    "S 9076",
    "S 9076 #69"
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "fragments": [
      "qwen-extract--s-9076-69-not-ok--s-9076-69"
    ],
    "field_provenance": {
      "date": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "scientist": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "aim": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "materials[0]": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "confidence": "high",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "materials[1]": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "confidence": "high",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "samples[0]": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "observations": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      },
      "outcome": {
        "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
        "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
        "extractor_version": "unversioned",
        "extracted_date": "",
        "locator": "full document (single page application test report)",
        "human_checked": true
      }
    },
    "last_merged": "2026-08-25"
  },
  "documents": [
    {
      "file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #69 not ok.docx",
      "role": "application_test",
      "link_basis": "alias match: S 9076",
      "link_status": "rule"
    }
  ],
  "validation": {
    "validated_fields": {},
    "corrections_applied": []
  },
  "date": "02.06.2026",
  "scientist": "Mr. Mohan Yadav",
  "aim": "Application testing of sample S 9076 (batch 69) against reference standard BYK 9076 as dispersing additive in Nitrocellulose ink resin base, in Violet 23, Violet 27, and Carbon Black N 330 ink systems.",
  "conditions": {
    "other": "Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured B4 Cup @26°C. Re-solubility rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent."
  },
  "materials": [
    {
      "name": "S 9076 (Batch No 69)",
      "role": "unknown",
      "physical_appearance": "Yellow viscous liquid",
      "role_verbatim": "sample under test"
    },
    {
      "name": "BYK 9076",
      "role": "unknown",
      "physical_appearance": "Amber to yellow viscous liquid",
      "role_verbatim": "reference standard"
    }
  ],
  "samples": [
    {
      "sample_name": "S 9076",
      "batch": "69",
      "reference_standard": "BYK 9076",
      "application_tests": [
        {
          "test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
          "system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 23",
          "result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Slightly opaque; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 98-99; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 29 s, S 9076 30 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 67.1, S 9076 64.2; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 1; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
          "vs_reference": "Colour shade as per standard; transparency slightly opaque vs reference; color strength 98-99 vs 100.00; re-solubility 1 (Fail) vs 3 (Average)"
        },
        {
          "test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
          "system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Violet 27",
          "result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Bluer; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 Transparent; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 60-70; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 27 s, S 9076 28 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 8.8, S 9076 7.9; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 18.5; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
          "vs_reference": "Colour shade bluer; color strength 60-70 vs 100.00; gloss 7.9 vs 8.8; re-solubility value 18.5 (outside 1-5 rating scale, verbatim as printed) vs 3"
        },
        {
          "test": "Application test (grinding, colour, transparency, color strength, viscosity, adhesion, gloss, re-solubility, separation, settling)",
          "system": "Nitrocellulose ink, Carbon Black N 330",
          "result": "Grinding (µm): Ref Standard < 5 µm, S 9076 < 5 µm; Colour Shade: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Transparency: Ref Standard Reference Std, S 9076 As per Std; Color Strength (%): Ref Standard 100.00, S 9076 100.00; Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): Ref Standard 32 s, S 9076 33 s; Adhesion (Tape Test): Ref Standard Pass, S 9076 Pass; Gloss @ 60°: Ref Standard 41.9, S 9076 45.4; Re-solubility (Rating): Ref Standard 3, S 9076 2; Separation: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No; Settling: Ref Standard No, S 9076 No",
          "vs_reference": "Matches reference on all parameters; re-solubility 2 (Poor) vs 3 (Average); gloss slightly higher (45.4 vs 41.9)"
        }
      ],
      "sample_id": "unspecified sample"
    }
  ],
  "observations": "Physical appearance: Reference Standard BYK 9076 – Amber to yellow viscous liquid; S 9076 – Yellow viscous liquid.\nViolet 23: S 9076 slightly opaque, color strength 98-99 vs 100.00, re-solubility rating 1 (Fail) vs 3.\nViolet 27: S 9076 colour shade bluer, color strength 60-70 vs 100.00, re-solubility printed value 18.5 vs 3.\nCarbon Black N 330: S 9076 in line with reference on all printed parameters.",
  "outcome": {
    "status": "not ok",
    "basis": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Colour strength inferior).",
    "citation": "S 9076 #69 not ok.docx, application test report (Results row)"
  }
}