Experiments / Batch 63
Batch 63 not OK
04.05.2026 issued; 05.05.2026 completed ·
Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap ·
also written as S 9076 · Batch No 63 · BYK 9076
Application test
not OK
2 tests
Conclusion — verbatim from the source
“Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).”
[S 9076 #63 not ok.docx, section "Results"]
Aim
Application test report: S 9076 Batch No 63 vs Reference Standard BYK 9076 in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane (Finalux 108), shades Violet 23 and Violet 27
No recipe or process data extracted yet.
Sample unspecified sample
not OK
Ink base evaluation (Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Finalux 108, Violet 23)
— Gloss and Re-solubility inferior
| Parameter | This sample |
|---|---|
| Grinding (µm) | < 5 µm (Ref Standard < 5 µm) |
| Colour Shade | As per Std (Ref Standard) |
| Transparency | Opaque (Ref Standard) |
| Color Strength (%) | 98-99 (Ref Standard 100.00) |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) | 22 s (Ref Standard 21 s) |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Pass (Ref Standard Pass) |
| Gloss @ 60° | 55.7 (Ref Standard 66.4) |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | 2 (Ref Standard 4) |
| Separation | No (Ref Standard No) |
| Settling | No (Ref Standard No) |
vs standard: Gloss and Re-solubility inferior to BYK 9076
not OK
Ink base evaluation (Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Finalux 108, Violet 27)
— Gloss and Re-solubility inferior
| Parameter | This sample |
|---|---|
| Grinding (µm) | < 5 µm (Ref Standard < 5 µm) |
| Colour Shade | As per Std (Ref Standard) |
| Transparency | Opaque (Ref Standard) |
| Color Strength (%) | 100.00 (Ref Standard 100.00) |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C) | 20 s (Ref Standard 19 s) |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Pass (Ref Standard Pass) |
| Gloss @ 60° | 8.1 (Ref Standard 7.8) |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | 2 (Ref Standard 4) |
| Separation | No (Ref Standard No) |
| Settling | No (Ref Standard No) |
vs standard: Re-solubility inferior to BYK 9076
Test report photos
Where this record comes from
S 9076 #63 not ok.docx
— application testing
Something wrong on this page? Record a correction
Your correction is permanent: it survives every re-extraction and the field can no longer be changed by the system.
Field-by-field provenance (6 fields) — for auditors
1 extraction fragments · merged 2026-08-25 · 0 human-validated fields
Fix a wrong or missing extraction side-by-side with the original:
qwen-extract--s-9076-63-not-ok--s-9076-63
| Field | Source | Extractor | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| scientist | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| aim | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| conclusion | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| samples[0] | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
| outcome | S 9076 #63 not ok.docx docx table, single page | qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md@unversioned | high |
Raw record JSON
{
"record_id": "exp-9076-063",
"project": "9076",
"aliases": [
"S 9076",
"Batch No 63",
"BYK 9076"
],
"provenance": {
"fragments": [
"qwen-extract--s-9076-63-not-ok--s-9076-63"
],
"field_provenance": {
"date": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
},
"scientist": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
},
"aim": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
},
"conclusion": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
},
"samples[0]": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
},
"outcome": {
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"extractor_version": "unversioned",
"extracted_date": "",
"locator": "docx table, single page",
"human_checked": true
}
},
"last_merged": "2026-08-25"
},
"documents": [
{
"file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #63 not ok.docx",
"role": "application_test",
"link_basis": "alias match: S 9076",
"link_status": "rule"
}
],
"validation": {
"validated_fields": {},
"corrections_applied": []
},
"date": "04.05.2026 issued; 05.05.2026 completed",
"scientist": "Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap",
"aim": "Application test report: S 9076 Batch No 63 vs Reference Standard BYK 9076 in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane (Finalux 108), shades Violet 23 and Violet 27",
"conclusion": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).",
"samples": [
{
"alias": "S 9076 Batch No 63",
"nature": "Liquid",
"colour": "Amber",
"reference_standard": "BYK 9076",
"application_tests": [
{
"test": "Ink base evaluation",
"system": "Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Finalux 108, Violet 23",
"conditions": "Viscosity measured as B4 Cup @26°C; Gloss @ 60°; Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50)",
"result": "Grinding (µm): < 5 µm (Ref Standard < 5 µm); Colour Shade: As per Std (Ref Standard); Transparency: Opaque (Ref Standard); Color Strength (%): 98-99 (Ref Standard 100.00); Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): 22 s (Ref Standard 21 s); Adhesion (Tape Test): Pass (Ref Standard Pass); Gloss @ 60°: 55.7 (Ref Standard 66.4); Re-solubility (Rating): 2 (Ref Standard 4); Separation: No (Ref Standard No); Settling: No (Ref Standard No)",
"vs_reference": "Gloss and Re-solubility inferior to BYK 9076",
"verdict": "not ok",
"failure_reason": "Gloss and Re-solubility inferior"
},
{
"test": "Ink base evaluation",
"system": "Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Finalux 108, Violet 27",
"conditions": "Viscosity measured as B4 Cup @26°C; Gloss @ 60°; Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50)",
"result": "Grinding (µm): < 5 µm (Ref Standard < 5 µm); Colour Shade: As per Std (Ref Standard); Transparency: Opaque (Ref Standard); Color Strength (%): 100.00 (Ref Standard 100.00); Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C): 20 s (Ref Standard 19 s); Adhesion (Tape Test): Pass (Ref Standard Pass); Gloss @ 60°: 8.1 (Ref Standard 7.8); Re-solubility (Rating): 2 (Ref Standard 4); Separation: No (Ref Standard No); Settling: No (Ref Standard No)",
"vs_reference": "Re-solubility inferior to BYK 9076",
"verdict": "not ok",
"failure_reason": "Gloss and Re-solubility inferior"
}
],
"sample_id": "unspecified sample"
}
],
"outcome": {
"status": "not ok",
"basis": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).",
"citation": "[S 9076 #63 not ok.docx, section \"Results\"]"
}
}
