Pipeline
Turn the document drop into verified experiment records — work the steps left to right.
1
Discoversee what's in the drop
2
Extractdocuments → data, checked as you go
3
Linkconnect to experiments
4
Browsethe experiment records
Original · S 9076 #66 not ok.docx
open ↗Document · S 9076 #66 not ok.md
| FINE ORGANIC INDUSTRIES LTD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEST REPORT | ||||
| Project No | Issued on | 04.05.2026 | ||
| Issued by | Completed on | 05.05.2026 | ||
| Representative | Nature of Sample | Ref Standard | Batch | |
| Sample Name | S 9076 | Liquid | Liquid | |
| Batch No | 66 | Colour of sample | Ref Standard | Batch |
| Reference Standard | BYK 9076 | Amber | Amber | |
| Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane | ||||
| Testing Parameter | Violet 23 | Violet 27 | ||
| Ref Standard | Finalux 108 | Ref Standard | Finalux 108 | |
| Grinding (µm) | < 5 µm | < 5 µm | < 5 µm | < 5 µm |
| Colour Shade | Reference Std | As per Std | Reference Std | As per Std |
| Transparency | Reference Std | Opaque | Reference Std | As per Std |
| Color Strength (%) | 100.00 | 98-99 | 100.00 | 98-99 |
| Viscosity (B4 Cup@26°C) | 21 s | 28 s | 19 s | 22 s |
| Adhesion (Tape Test) | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gloss @ 60° | 66.4 | 58.7 | 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Re-solubility (Rating) | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Separation | No | No | No | No |
| Settling | No | No | No | No |
| Rating: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent | ||||
| Note: Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). | ||||
| Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior). | ||||
| Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav | ||||
| Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap | ||||
Extracted values
… checked
Cited: single-page test report (whole document) (highlighted). Compare with the original on the left.
Press Enter to OK the highlighted value, or click OK / fix on any value.
Experiment: exp-9076-066
✓ Every value checked — fragment marked reviewed.
All checked — go to Link →
date
high04.05.2026 (Issued on); 05.05.2026 (Completed on)
scientist
highCompleted By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap
aim
highApplication test of S 9076 Batch 66 in Nitrocellulose Polyurethane ink base (Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems) against reference standard BYK 9076.
other
highRating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent. Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured with B4 Cup @26°C.
Materials high
| # | name | role | notes | role_verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | S 9076 | unknown | Batch No 66; Nature of Sample: Liquid; Colour: Amber | sample under test |
| 1 | BYK 9076 | unknown | Nature: Liquid; Colour: Amber | reference standard |
| 2 | Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane | unknown | — | test system / ink base |
| 3 | Violet 23 | unknown | — | pigment / colorant in test system |
| 4 | Violet 27 | unknown | — | pigment / colorant in test system |
| 5 | Finalux 108 | unknown | — | reference standard for both Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems |
Samples high
S 9076 Batch 66
| # | test | system | conditions | result | vs_reference | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 23 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108) | Violet 23 | vs Ref Standard Finalux 108 | {"Grinding (µm)": "Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm", "Colour Shade": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Transparency": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: Opaque", "Color Strength (%)": "Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99", "Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)": "Ref Standard: 21 s; Batch: 28 s", "Adhesion (Tape Test)": "Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass", "Gloss @ 60°": "Ref Standard: 66.4; Batch: 58.7", "Re-solubility (Rating)": "Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2", "Separation": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No", "Settling": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No"} | Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Transparency (Opaque vs Reference Std), Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Viscosity (28 s vs 21 s), Gloss @ 60° (58.7 vs 66.4), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Grinding, Colour Shade, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard | not ok |
| 1 | Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 27 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108) | Violet 27 | vs Ref Standard Finalux 108 | {"Grinding (µm)": "Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm", "Colour Shade": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Transparency": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Color Strength (%)": "Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99", "Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)": "Ref Standard: 19 s; Batch: 22 s", "Adhesion (Tape Test)": "Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass", "Gloss @ 60°": "Ref Standard: 7.8; Batch: 9.3", "Re-solubility (Rating)": "Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2", "Separation": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No", "Settling": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No"} | Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Viscosity (22 s vs 19 s) and Gloss @ 60° (9.3 vs 7.8) numerically differ; Grinding, Colour Shade, Transparency, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard | not ok |
Outcome high
statusnot ok
basisResults: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).
citation[S 9076 #66 not ok.docx, page 1]
More actions — correct a value · link · ignore
History (1)
| Action | Field | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| verify | 2026-08-21 |
Raw fragment JSON
{
"fragment_id": "qwen-extract--S_9076_66_not_ok--S_9076_66",
"source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #66 not ok.docx",
"derived_from": "ocr/S 9076 #66 not ok/S 9076 #66 not ok.md",
"locator": "single-page test report (whole document)",
"extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
"target_aliases": [
"S 9076",
"S 9076 #66",
"66",
"BYK 9076",
"Finalux 108"
],
"document_role": "application_test",
"payload": {
"date": "04.05.2026 (Issued on); 05.05.2026 (Completed on)",
"scientist": "Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap",
"aim": "Application test of S 9076 Batch 66 in Nitrocellulose Polyurethane ink base (Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems) against reference standard BYK 9076.",
"materials": [
{
"name": "S 9076",
"role": "unknown",
"notes": "Batch No 66; Nature of Sample: Liquid; Colour: Amber",
"role_verbatim": "sample under test"
},
{
"name": "BYK 9076",
"role": "unknown",
"notes": "Nature: Liquid; Colour: Amber",
"role_verbatim": "reference standard"
},
{
"name": "Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane",
"role": "unknown",
"role_verbatim": "test system / ink base"
},
{
"name": "Violet 23",
"role": "unknown",
"role_verbatim": "pigment / colorant in test system"
},
{
"name": "Violet 27",
"role": "unknown",
"role_verbatim": "pigment / colorant in test system"
},
{
"name": "Finalux 108",
"role": "unknown",
"role_verbatim": "reference standard for both Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems"
}
],
"conditions": {
"other": "Rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent. Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured with B4 Cup @26°C."
},
"samples": [
{
"sample_id": "S 9076 Batch 66",
"name": "S 9076",
"batch": "66",
"application_tests": [
{
"test": "Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 23 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108)",
"system": "Violet 23",
"conditions": "vs Ref Standard Finalux 108",
"result": "{\"Grinding (µm)\": \"Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm\", \"Colour Shade\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Transparency\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: Opaque\", \"Color Strength (%)\": \"Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99\", \"Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)\": \"Ref Standard: 21 s; Batch: 28 s\", \"Adhesion (Tape Test)\": \"Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass\", \"Gloss @ 60°\": \"Ref Standard: 66.4; Batch: 58.7\", \"Re-solubility (Rating)\": \"Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2\", \"Separation\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\", \"Settling\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\"}",
"vs_reference": "Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Transparency (Opaque vs Reference Std), Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Viscosity (28 s vs 21 s), Gloss @ 60° (58.7 vs 66.4), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Grinding, Colour Shade, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard",
"verdict": "not ok"
},
{
"test": "Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 27 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108)",
"system": "Violet 27",
"conditions": "vs Ref Standard Finalux 108",
"result": "{\"Grinding (µm)\": \"Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm\", \"Colour Shade\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Transparency\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Color Strength (%)\": \"Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99\", \"Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)\": \"Ref Standard: 19 s; Batch: 22 s\", \"Adhesion (Tape Test)\": \"Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass\", \"Gloss @ 60°\": \"Ref Standard: 7.8; Batch: 9.3\", \"Re-solubility (Rating)\": \"Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2\", \"Separation\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\", \"Settling\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\"}",
"vs_reference": "Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Viscosity (22 s vs 19 s) and Gloss @ 60° (9.3 vs 7.8) numerically differ; Grinding, Colour Shade, Transparency, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard",
"verdict": "not ok"
}
],
"notes": "Re-solubility photos for both systems are included in the report as embedded images (media/image3.jpeg, media/image2.jpeg); only the rating numbers are in the text layer."
}
],
"outcome": {
"status": "not ok",
"basis": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).",
"citation": "[S 9076 #66 not ok.docx, page 1]"
}
},
"field_confidence": {
"date": "high",
"scientist": "high",
"aim": "high",
"materials": "high",
"conditions": "high",
"samples": "high",
"outcome": "high"
},
"notes": "Single experiment (application test of batch 66). 'Issued by', 'Representative' and 'Project No' fields are blank in the report. Gloss @ 60° for Violet 27 system shows the batch numerically HIGHER than the reference standard (9.3 vs 7.8); the report's own Results line attributes the Not OK verdict to 'Gloss and Re-solubility inferior' — reproduced verbatim, not reinterpreted."
}
