← Back

Pipeline

Turn the document drop into verified experiment records — work the steps left to right.

Next: All caught up — every fragment is reviewed and linked. Browse Experiments →

← S 9076 #66 not ok.docx

Original · S 9076 #66 not ok.docx

open ↗

Document · S 9076 #66 not ok.md

FINE ORGANIC INDUSTRIES LTD
TEST REPORT
Project No Issued on 04.05.2026
Issued by Completed on 05.05.2026
Representative Nature of Sample Ref Standard Batch
Sample Name S 9076 Liquid Liquid
Batch No 66 Colour of sample Ref Standard Batch
Reference Standard BYK 9076 Amber Amber
Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane
Testing Parameter Violet 23 Violet 27
Ref Standard Finalux 108 Ref Standard Finalux 108
Grinding (µm) < 5 µm < 5 µm < 5 µm < 5 µm
Colour Shade Reference Std As per Std Reference Std As per Std
Transparency Reference Std Opaque Reference Std As per Std
Color Strength (%) 100.00 98-99 100.00 98-99
Viscosity (B4 Cup@26°C) 21 s 28 s 19 s 22 s
Adhesion (Tape Test) Pass Pass Pass Pass
Gloss @ 60° 66.4 58.7 7.8 9.3
Re-solubility (Rating) 4 2 4 2
Separation No No No No
Settling No No No No
Rating: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent
Note: Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50).
Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).
Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav
Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap
**Re-solubility**
Photos embedded in S 9076 #66 not ok.docx — 2

Extracted values

checked
Cited: single-page test report (whole document) (highlighted). Compare with the original on the left. Press Enter to OK the highlighted value, or click OK / fix on any value. Experiment: exp-9076-066
date high04.05.2026 (Issued on); 05.05.2026 (Completed on) scientist highCompleted By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap aim highApplication test of S 9076 Batch 66 in Nitrocellulose Polyurethane ink base (Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems) against reference standard BYK 9076. other highRating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent. Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured with B4 Cup @26°C.

Materials high

#namerolenotesrole_verbatim
0 S 9076 unknown Batch No 66; Nature of Sample: Liquid; Colour: Amber sample under test
1 BYK 9076 unknown Nature: Liquid; Colour: Amber reference standard
2 Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane unknown test system / ink base
3 Violet 23 unknown pigment / colorant in test system
4 Violet 27 unknown pigment / colorant in test system
5 Finalux 108 unknown reference standard for both Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems

Samples high

S 9076 Batch 66
#testsystemconditionsresultvs_referenceverdict
0 Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 23 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108) Violet 23 vs Ref Standard Finalux 108 {"Grinding (µm)": "Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm", "Colour Shade": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Transparency": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: Opaque", "Color Strength (%)": "Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99", "Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)": "Ref Standard: 21 s; Batch: 28 s", "Adhesion (Tape Test)": "Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass", "Gloss @ 60°": "Ref Standard: 66.4; Batch: 58.7", "Re-solubility (Rating)": "Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2", "Separation": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No", "Settling": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No"} Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Transparency (Opaque vs Reference Std), Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Viscosity (28 s vs 21 s), Gloss @ 60° (58.7 vs 66.4), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Grinding, Colour Shade, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard not ok
1 Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 27 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108) Violet 27 vs Ref Standard Finalux 108 {"Grinding (µm)": "Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm", "Colour Shade": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Transparency": "Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std", "Color Strength (%)": "Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99", "Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)": "Ref Standard: 19 s; Batch: 22 s", "Adhesion (Tape Test)": "Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass", "Gloss @ 60°": "Ref Standard: 7.8; Batch: 9.3", "Re-solubility (Rating)": "Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2", "Separation": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No", "Settling": "Ref Standard: No; Batch: No"} Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Viscosity (22 s vs 19 s) and Gloss @ 60° (9.3 vs 7.8) numerically differ; Grinding, Colour Shade, Transparency, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard not ok

Outcome high

statusnot ok basisResults: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior). citation[S 9076 #66 not ok.docx, page 1]
More actions — correct a value · link · ignore
Action Field path Corrected value Cause Note permanent — survives every re-run
History (1)
ActionFieldValueDate
verify 2026-08-21
Raw fragment JSON
{
  "fragment_id": "qwen-extract--S_9076_66_not_ok--S_9076_66",
  "source_file": "pdf/9076 Data for Raven POC project/Application tetsing Report/S 9076 #66 not ok.docx",
  "derived_from": "ocr/S 9076 #66 not ok/S 9076 #66 not ok.md",
  "locator": "single-page test report (whole document)",
  "extractor": "qwen-tasks/extract-fragment.md",
  "target_aliases": [
    "S 9076",
    "S 9076 #66",
    "66",
    "BYK 9076",
    "Finalux 108"
  ],
  "document_role": "application_test",
  "payload": {
    "date": "04.05.2026 (Issued on); 05.05.2026 (Completed on)",
    "scientist": "Completed By: Mr. Mohan Yadav; Authorized By: Dr. Sachin Jagtap",
    "aim": "Application test of S 9076 Batch 66 in Nitrocellulose Polyurethane ink base (Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems) against reference standard BYK 9076.",
    "materials": [
      {
        "name": "S 9076",
        "role": "unknown",
        "notes": "Batch No 66; Nature of Sample: Liquid; Colour: Amber",
        "role_verbatim": "sample under test"
      },
      {
        "name": "BYK 9076",
        "role": "unknown",
        "notes": "Nature: Liquid; Colour: Amber",
        "role_verbatim": "reference standard"
      },
      {
        "name": "Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane",
        "role": "unknown",
        "role_verbatim": "test system / ink base"
      },
      {
        "name": "Violet 23",
        "role": "unknown",
        "role_verbatim": "pigment / colorant in test system"
      },
      {
        "name": "Violet 27",
        "role": "unknown",
        "role_verbatim": "pigment / colorant in test system"
      },
      {
        "name": "Finalux 108",
        "role": "unknown",
        "role_verbatim": "reference standard for both Violet 23 and Violet 27 systems"
      }
    ],
    "conditions": {
      "other": "Rating scale: 1 – Fail, 2 – Poor, 3 – Average, 4 – Good, 5 – Excellent. Re-solubility tested in Ethyl Acetate + Toluene (50:50). Viscosity measured with B4 Cup @26°C."
    },
    "samples": [
      {
        "sample_id": "S 9076 Batch 66",
        "name": "S 9076",
        "batch": "66",
        "application_tests": [
          {
            "test": "Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 23 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108)",
            "system": "Violet 23",
            "conditions": "vs Ref Standard Finalux 108",
            "result": "{\"Grinding (µm)\": \"Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm\", \"Colour Shade\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Transparency\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: Opaque\", \"Color Strength (%)\": \"Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99\", \"Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)\": \"Ref Standard: 21 s; Batch: 28 s\", \"Adhesion (Tape Test)\": \"Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass\", \"Gloss @ 60°\": \"Ref Standard: 66.4; Batch: 58.7\", \"Re-solubility (Rating)\": \"Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2\", \"Separation\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\", \"Settling\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\"}",
            "vs_reference": "Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Transparency (Opaque vs Reference Std), Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Viscosity (28 s vs 21 s), Gloss @ 60° (58.7 vs 66.4), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Grinding, Colour Shade, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard",
            "verdict": "not ok"
          },
          {
            "test": "Application test in Ink Base – Nitrocellulose Polyurethane, Violet 27 system (Ref Standard Finalux 108)",
            "system": "Violet 27",
            "conditions": "vs Ref Standard Finalux 108",
            "result": "{\"Grinding (µm)\": \"Ref Standard < 5 µm; Batch < 5 µm\", \"Colour Shade\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Transparency\": \"Ref Standard: Reference Std; Batch: As per Std\", \"Color Strength (%)\": \"Ref Standard: 100.00; Batch: 98-99\", \"Viscosity (B4 Cup @26°C)\": \"Ref Standard: 19 s; Batch: 22 s\", \"Adhesion (Tape Test)\": \"Ref Standard: Pass; Batch: Pass\", \"Gloss @ 60°\": \"Ref Standard: 7.8; Batch: 9.3\", \"Re-solubility (Rating)\": \"Ref Standard: 4; Batch: 2\", \"Separation\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\", \"Settling\": \"Ref Standard: No; Batch: No\"}",
            "vs_reference": "Batch inferior to Ref Standard on Color Strength (98-99 vs 100.00), Re-solubility (2 vs 4); Viscosity (22 s vs 19 s) and Gloss @ 60° (9.3 vs 7.8) numerically differ; Grinding, Colour Shade, Transparency, Adhesion, Separation, Settling as per standard",
            "verdict": "not ok"
          }
        ],
        "notes": "Re-solubility photos for both systems are included in the report as embedded images (media/image3.jpeg, media/image2.jpeg); only the rating numbers are in the text layer."
      }
    ],
    "outcome": {
      "status": "not ok",
      "basis": "Results: Not OK (Gloss and Re-solubility inferior).",
      "citation": "[S 9076 #66 not ok.docx, page 1]"
    }
  },
  "field_confidence": {
    "date": "high",
    "scientist": "high",
    "aim": "high",
    "materials": "high",
    "conditions": "high",
    "samples": "high",
    "outcome": "high"
  },
  "notes": "Single experiment (application test of batch 66). 'Issued by', 'Representative' and 'Project No' fields are blank in the report. Gloss @ 60° for Violet 27 system shows the batch numerically HIGHER than the reference standard (9.3 vs 7.8); the report's own Results line attributes the Not OK verdict to 'Gloss and Re-solubility inferior' — reproduced verbatim, not reinterpreted."
}